COSMOS
COSMOS
Grombowicz
saw humor in this search, naming his leading man (failing at both the bar exam
and all attempts to write a novel) Witold after himself and putting the character
through all manner of agony emotional,
intellectual, ontological — during his stay at a French guest house run by
Alain Resnais’s actress widow, Sabine Azema, whose hair is an electric red
powder puff. Meanwhile, Zulawski seems to relate most to the caretaker’s
eccentric second husband, Leon, who knows more than he lets on and babbles in a
strange Latinate language all his own (“blah-blah-tum,” he says, coining a
word, “the bleurgh,” that overtakes his speech).To play Witold, Zulawski casts
tall, vampire-looking Jonathan Genet, contrasting the actor’s rigid, almost
androgynous attitude with that of his companion, a street tough turned fashion
maven named Fuchs (Johan Libereau): short, agitated and defiantly
anti-intellectual. The two young men serve for their authors as other comedic
duos have onstage — take the Godot-attendant Vladimir and
Estragon or Tom Stoppard’s versions of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern — a
source of comedic wordplay and playfully abstract contrasts.While Witold spends
his hours lost in thought, Fuchs goes out each night in search of rough trade
— really rough, or so
goes a running background joke, as Fuchs comes back each morning with black
eyes and bruises that are never addressed or explained. Witold, on the other
hand, finds himself obsessed with the two younger women sharing the guest house.
One is the proprietor’s newly married — and deeply melancholic — daughter,
Lena (Victoria Guerra), whom he covets at the dining room table, caressing
the cutlery as if it were her hand. The other is a facially disfigured maid
(Clementine Pons, the actress with the double role) whose imperfection
intrigues them.
Cosmos cinema is the most like dreaming, and
yet over the years, moviegoers have relinquished the virtually boundless
potential of that medium in favor of rote realism: On the blank slate that is
the bigscreen, whether they realize it or not, most audiences expect cause to
precede effect and for logic to govern what they see. In considering both the
macro (the cosmos)
and the micro (a film like “Cosmos”), they seek intelligent design, but rarely
find more than irrational chaos — particularly in the work of a cult
director like Zulawski (known for such erotically charged psycho-sexual
provocations as “Possession” and “La femme publique”).
While
not an especially revealing actor in terms of what his performance says about
his character’s inner turmoil, Genet falls squarely in that European tradition
of thesps whose look does most of the work: His gaunt face and sunken blue eyes
convey both the hunger of wanting to Figure It All Out and the horror of
realizing there is No Answer. Jean-Paul Sartre might have clued him in to that
futility, and sure enough, “Nausea” is one of maybe a dozen works overtly cited
by the characters, only a fraction of them cinematic, including Pasolini’s
“Theorema” and amusingly enough, Zulawski’s own “That Most Important
Thing: Love.
Comments
Post a Comment